SummaryGlobal GuidelinesTechnical and interactive resources
What do we mean by integration?
As biodiversity continues to decline, focusing on protected and conserved areas (PCAs) as solutions alone has proven insufficient. The broader drivers of biodiversity loss need to be addressed. For example, restoring degraded areas between PCAs, reducing pollution impacts, or preventing the “leakage” of deforestation displaced by PCAs into the surrounding landscape.
Integrating PCAs into wider landscapes, seascapes and the ocean implies that PCAs should not be considered or managed as isolated islands for biodiversity, but rather as part of wider strategies for conservation and sustainable development beyond the areas themselves. This includes integration in terms of geography and biology (i.e., connectivity, buffers, etc.), policy coherence and coordination, and social integration. elsewhere on this site, so the focus here is on restoration and integration into policy and social systems.
Linking restoration and integration into policy and social systems
Integration involves factoring PCAs into broader sectoral and development planning, including local, national and regional spatial planning and water basin planning. It means considering the impacts and dependencies between PCAs and surrounding areas and people. This will likely involve sustainable management, halting of Land-Use-Change (LUC) damaging to biodiversity, restoration of areas outside PCAs and management of shared lands, inland waters and oceans, particularly in areas of importance for biodiversity or ecosystem services. It will involve legislation enabling and requiring more strategic siting of infrastructure and more wildlife-friendly designs for that infrastructure, such as dams and roads, to ensure overall natural system connectivity necessary to conserve biodiversity within PCAs.
An overview of the state of partially degraded areas can help prioritize areas for restoration; enhancing ecological representation and connectivity, while providing refuges for biodiversity, with these areas potentially integrated into the network of PCAs over time. The Global Human Footprint Index maps out states of degradation. Restoration and conservation activities have the potential to halt biodiversity loss, but only if the broader drivers of biodiversity loss are also addressed such as the overconsumption of natural resources and the pollution of areas important for biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Planners will likely need to identify the many ways in which PCAs and the surrounding nature are enhancing human well-being, such as the provision of ecosystem services and economic benefits. Such an exercise can be done using tools like the Protected Areas Benefits Assessment Tool. This knowledge will be important for informing sustainable management and restoration of areas outside the area covered by Target 3.
Policy makers in shipping and fisheries should safeguard Blue Corridors, Arctic superhighways for migrating whales, seals and walrus, by reducing ship speeds, rerouting vessels, regulating sonar usage and mitigating risks of oil spills. These international waters would then be better integrated into the PCAs of the Arctic region.
Enabling factors and challenges
Integration of PCAs into wider landscapes and seascapes will bring many Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) targets and other international agreements into alignment. GBF Targets 1–3 are tightly connected to this component, and Target 4 on species and reduction of human-wildlife conflict, Target 7 on reducing the impacts of pollution and Targets 9 and 10 on sustainable use and management.
Like connectivity, this component needs to involve stakeholders outside typical conservation actors. Blue Corridors for example would need to involve the ministries of fisheries, shipping and maritime affairs. This presents both a challenge – securing the buy-in of stakeholders with very diverse interests, often unfamiliar with biodiversity conservation – and an opportunity to generate support for conservation from a much broader segment of society.
The purpose of the Technical Guidance for Biosphere Reserves (TGBR) is to support the implementation of the articles of the Statutory Framework and subsequent Strategies and Action Plans. It is based on the practical experience of the Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme. As the TGBR cannot respond to all possible questions and needs, its design is purposefully flexible and will be periodically updated. It is also designed to be used in conjunction with the TGBR support webpage, where topics can be shared and discussed in greater detail.
The primary target group of this document is stakeholders of existing and prospective biosphere reserves. The term ‘stakeholder’ is used in this document for reasons of simplicity, as the individuals and groups concerned with, and with a stake in, biosphere reserves are as diverse as the biosphere reserves themselves. They include all right holders at all levels of society and may have various levels of affiliation to the MAB Programme.